Commissioner of Domestic Taxes vs. Sendy Limited
Private Rulings Cannot Override the correct statutory interpretation of the law by a court of competent jurisdiction.
"...This action raises significant questions regarding the principle of legitimate expectation, a cornerstone of administrative justice. A taxpayer is entitled to rely on clear, unambiguous and unqualified representations made by a tax authority. For the Respondent to unilaterally resile from its own binding ruling without compelling justification risks undermining legal certainty and fairness in tax administration. While the Appellant’s conduct is a matter of concern, a private ruling cannot, however, override the correct statutory interpretation of the law by a court of competent jurisdiction. The ultimate duty of this Court is to interpret and apply the law as enacted by Parliament."
Access Restricted Content
Please log in or subscribe to continue reading.
View our pricing plansAlready have a subscription? Sign In